Emergency Labor Network Labor in a fist
CP Hunger Rally Martin Luther King rally Wisconsin State Capitol

No to Obama’s Push to Change COLA and Cut Safety Net Benefits!

The March 29, 2013 Wall Street Journal ran an article titled, “White House Weighing Entitlement Limits.” The article begins by stating:

“The White House is strongly considering including limits on entitlement benefits in its 2014 budget — a proposal it first offered Republicans in December. The move would be aimed in part at keeping alive bipartisan talks on a major budget deal.

“Such a proposal could include steps that make many Democrats queasy, such as reductions in future Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security payments ....”

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has already stated that she is open to changing the Social Security COLA (chained CPI).

CPI stands for consumer price index, a formula that looks at how the prices of stuff we need (food, for example) change over time. It’s used to make cost-of-living adjustments to programs such as Social Security, veterans benefits and food stamps.

According to United Press International, “The latest mantra in budget rhetoric — chained CPI — has become a rallying cry for seniors and organizations like AARP, which see the change in calculating inflation for entitlement and other programs floated by President Obama as having a disproportionate impact on the elderly.”

But it’s not just the elderly. The change to the chained CPI would also cut benefits to veterans, low-income people with disabilities, and many others who rely on government programs.

The bottom line is this: the cost-of-living adjustments would be lower with the proposed new chained CPI than with the old chained CPI.

It has been estimated that the change would reduce the debt and deficit by $230 billion over 10 years. But at the price of reducing benefits for tens of millions of people!

The concessions that President Obama is willing to make in cutting “entitlements” are just for openers in negotiations with Republicans in order to arrive at a “Grand Bargain.” Other ideas that are being bruited about include increasing premiums for Medicare, increasing deductions, and increasing co-pays. In short, more out-of-pocket expenses for beneficiaries.

We are still in the early phases of an historic showdown which will decide this question: Who will bear the brunt of the economic crisis shaking this country with mounting federal deficits and debts, and with 25 million still unemployed or underemployed? Will it be the banks and big corporations through such measures as closing corporate tax loopholes, scrapping the cap on Social Security (which today allows the big money people to be exempt from paying any payroll tax after their first $113,700 rolls in each year), increasing the capital gains tax, a tax on financial transactions, and capping the amount of deductions they can claim?

[Note: Last year, Citizens for Tax Justice found that 30 major corporations had made billions of dollars in profits—while paying no federal income tax between 2008 and 2010. The CTJ updated that report to reflect the 2011 tax bill of those 30 companies, and 26 of them have still managed to pay absolutely nothing over that four year period.]

Or will it be the working class with cuts in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other social programs hit hard by the sequestration; the 500,000 fewer workers employed by federal, state and local governments since 2007; the cuts in the amount and duration of unemployment compensation; the scaling back and even elimination of pension programs; the privatization of public schools; or the restrictions on the legal right of unions to strike, organize the unorganized, and otherwise defend the interest of workers and community allies in the face of all the attacks?

The Way Out

To curb, stop, and reverse the severe assaults directed against the overwhelming majority by the forces of reaction will, in our opinion, require three facets of a fightback campaign: first, building an independent labor movement that affirms labor’s fightback demands; second, mobilizing the rank-and-file and taking to the streets in large numbers in support of those demands; and third, forging unity of the labor movement and our allies.

As to the first, for much too long labor has tied its fortunes to the Democratic Party with disastrous results. It was under Democratic Party administrations that we got Taft-Hartley; NAFTA; the “free trade” agreements with Colombia, South Korea and Panama; unjust wars and occupations; the gutting of welfare rights; the sequestration; and the continuing push to undermine and underfund safety net programs. The argument that we would even be worse off under the Republicans obscures the fact that underneath the rhetoric and name calling, the two major political parties have collaborated every step along the way in holding down labor and promoting the interests of big business. For example, in neither Democratic nor Republican administrations did we get labor law reform, the Employee Free Choice Act (card check), or bailing out the people instead of the banks and investment houses during the recession.

As AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka emphasized in 2010, “It’s not time to leave it to any political party to take care of us once we put them in office. It’s time to organize and mobilize as never before to make every elected or aspiring leader PROVE he or she will create the jobs we need in an economy we need with the health care we need.…I know we are the people who can mobilize a massive army to force elected leaders to deliver.”

We could not agree more. And this only underscores the second point: the need to mobilize the rank-and-file and take to the streets. It seems that every time some critical issue comes up that affects labor, the call goes out to lobby members of Congress, write them, call them, send them petitions, etc. All of these have their place. And to be sure, there is also a call to organize local rallies, which are needed, but by themselves have proven insufficient to win the changes we need or defeat the measures we oppose. What we need now are national actions, such as a March on Washington and the West Coast, organized in concert with our community allies and reaching out to recipients of earned benefits, especially Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

Finally, it is high time for the organized labor movement to come together in united actions if we are to meet the daunting challenges confronting us today. Think what it would mean if a national demonstration were co-sponsored by the AFL-CIO, Change to Win, the National Education Association, and allies in the civil rights and other social movements in support of such demands as a full employment economy, no cuts to safety net programs, rescind the sequestration, defend workers’ rights, and redirect war spending to meet human needs.

The Need to Meet and Strategize

Nothing is more important at this time than for concerned trade unionists to gather together to discuss and debate a plan of action for the way forward. For this reason, the South Carolina AFL-CIO and the Wisconsin South Central Federation of Labor call for a national Labor Fightback Conference to be held May 10–12, 2013 at Rutgers University could not be more timely. Visit the conference website at http://laborfightback.org/conference/ for details.


Wisconsin, South Carolina Unions Call
National Labor Fightback Conference for May

February 8, 2013—Below please find the Open Letter issued 10 days ago inviting unions to attend a national Labor Fightback Conference sponsored by Wisconsin and South Carolina labor organizations. As you will note, the conference is to be held at Rutgers University May 10–12, 2013.

The Emergency Labor Network, which has consistently posed the need for an independent labor movement—meaning a labor movement that breaks with its ties of subordination to the Democratic Party in order to fully champion the interests of its members and the working class majority—welcomes this initiative, which we strongly believe is timely and urgently needed for the reasons spelled out in the Open Letter.

We are gratified that this conference calls for a strategic discussion on how best to promote an independent labor fightback and that it seeks to advance this perspective through a few selected united-front action campaigns that can point the way forward for the entire labor movement. This is most urgent at a time when the labor movement and the working class as a whole are being subjected to relentless attacks by the corporate class all across the board. A concerted militant and massive fightback is clearly the order of the day.

Since the Call states that attendance at the conference is open to “any interested union [which is] free to send as many representatives as desired,” we urge concerned trade unionists to seek endorsement of the Labor Fightback Conference by their unions and the selection of representatives to attend.

For more information, please contact the conference organizers at (973) 944-8975, or e-mail conference@laborfightback.org, or write Labor Fightback Conference, P.O. Box 187, Flanders, NJ 07836.


Open Letter to Concerned Trade Unionists

Dear Brothers and Sisters:

Please be advised that a national Labor Fightback Conference for concerned trade unionists who want to do something about labor’s plight will be held May 10–12, 2013 at the Rutgers University Student Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey. The undersigned urge attendance at this critically needed conference, with any interested union free to send as many representatives as desired.

This conference will address the key question: “What strategy will enable labor to mount the most effective and powerful fightback possible against the corporate assaults?”

The conference is being held in the aftermath of enactment of right-to-work in Michigan and Indiana; destruction of bargaining rights for Wisconsin public employees; the all-out assault on defined pension plans; demands by large corporations making huge profits for substantial concessions; layoffs, curtailment of benefits, and other austerity measures in cities and states across the country; 25 million unemployed or underemployed; and the list goes on.

And in the months to come, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other vitally needed social programs will be targeted for steep cuts, which could imperil the health, safety, welfare and very lives of the tens of millions of people who are dependent on these programs.

Labor’s plight — and the plight of the working class as a whole — is dire but by no means hopeless.

Despite the defeat of the recall, we take heart in the mobilization of over 100,000 Wisconsin workers and the occupation of the state’s capitol building, labor’s stunning referendum victory in Ohio, the outcome of the Chicago Teachers strike, victories of the West Coast longshore workers, and the new winds blowing in the struggles of low paid retail workers at Walmart and many food centers for a living wage and basic human rights, including the right to have union representation.

The purpose of the Rutgers conference is to explore how we in labor can most effectively mount an independent fightback action campaign based on such united front demands as putting America back to work; preserving and expanding safety net programs based on No Cuts, No Concessions, No Shared Sacrifice; Medicare for All; retirement security; and redirecting war spending to fund human needs.

We also strongly believe that labor must resurrect campaigns to organize the South and repeal repressive anti-labor legislation, especially Taft-Hartley. In this regard, we welcome the development of the Southern Workers Assembly at its recent meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina, which drew hundreds of trade unionists and others.

At the centerpiece of a fightback action campaign, in our opinion, is the building of labor-community coalitions. The Chicago teachers set an example for the entire labor movement by the way they forged an alliance with community groups and activists, which was key to the teachers’ victory. The Rutgers conference can help advance the formation of such coalitions on a local and national level.

It is through building labor-community coalitions that we will be able to mobilize the largest number of people. Confining ourselves to lobbying and nothing more will not get the job done. Street heat that will move hundreds of thousands — even millions when you consider the 90 million people who depend on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid — is what is needed now more than ever.

Finally, at Rutgers we can discuss how to hold accountable politicians whose loyalty is to the corporations, not the working class majority — politicians we often supported in the past and who betrayed our trust. How best can we fight for our own agenda? Isn’t it high time to assert labor’s independence in our workplaces and in the streets? Isn’t it time to open a discussion on what it will take for labor to be more effective in the electoral arena?

We hope that you agree that there is a compelling need for trade unionists concerned about the issues cited above to convene for a free-wheeling discussion and debate leading to an action program. Please plan to join us for the Rutgers conference (a registration form will be posted separately). We look forward to seeing you there!

An endorsement form is below. We encourage your union to endorse the conference and do everything possible to build and publicize it.

For further information, please call (973) 944-8975 or email conference@laborfightback.org or write Labor Fightback Conference, P.O. Box 187, Flanders, NJ 07836.

In solidarity,

Ken Riley
President
South Carolina AFL-CIO

Donna Dewitt
Retired President
South Carolina AFL-CIO

Kevin Gundlach
President
South Central Federation of Labor, Wisconsin

Charity Schmidt
Co-President
University of Wisconsin-Madison Teaching Assistants’ Association (TAA)
Executive Board, South Central Federation of Labor, Wisconsin

laborfightback.org